Analisis Percepatan Waktu Pekerjaan Rigid Pavement Menggunakan Critical Path Method (CPM) (Studi Kasus: Proyek Pembangunan Jalan Kawasan Heartful Town Depok)

Main Article Content

Abstract

Road construction projects often encounter delays, particularly in rigid pavement development, where precise scheduling and execution are essential. The Heartful Town Road Construction Project in Depok experienced delays due to limited control over critical activities and the absence of scheduling analysis using the Critical Path Method (CPM). This study aims to evaluate project acceleration through CPM and crash duration analysis. Data from the project management team were used to build a work network and determine the critical path. Two acceleration strategies were examined: extending working hours and increasing workforce allocation. Results showed the initial project duration of 130 days was reduced to 127 days with one hour of daily overtime, and to 114 days with three hours of overtime. Alternatively, increasing the workforce by 50% on critical activities shortened the subbase layer from 33 to 18 days, compaction from 21 to 14 days, lean concrete casting from 28 to 15 days, and rigid pavement casting from 42 to 27 days. These reductions produced a total critical path duration of 80 days. The findings highlight that combining CPM with crash duration methods, either through overtime or additional workers, effectively accelerates project completion without changing the activity sequence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

A. B. L. Hilda Rahsa Pramesti, “Analisa Pengendalian Waktu Dengan Metode Critical Path Method (Cpm) Pada Proyek Pembangunan Pondok Iqro’, Surakarta,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Tek. Sipil, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 560–566, 2023.

N. Sa’adah, E. Iqrammah, and T. Rijanto, “Evaluasi Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Stroke Center (Paviliun Flamboyan) Menggunakan Metode Critical Path Method (CPM) Dan Crashing,” Publ. Ris. Orientasi Tek. Sipil, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 55–62, 2022, doi: 10.26740/proteksi.v3n2.p55-62.

Mudatsir, A. U. Sumaga, and M. Y. Tuloli, “Pengendalian Proyek Dengan Menggunakan Metode Crash Program (Studi Kasus Pembangunan Bendungan Bulango Ulu Paket 1, Item Pekejaan Maindam, Provinsi Gorontalo),” Res. Rev. J. Ilm. Multidisiplin, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 476–487, 2025, doi: 10.54923/researchreview.v4i1.158.

S. S. Aulia, “Analisis Penjadwalan Proyek Gedung Menggunakan Metode CPM-PERT ( Critical Path Method-Program Evaluation And Review Technique ) ( Analysis Of Building Project Scheduling Using The Cpm-Pert Method ),” Univ. Islam Indones., 2021.

O. A. Koten and H. T. Tjendani, “Analisis Biaya dan Waktu Menggunakan Metode Crashing pada Peningkatan Jalan Naibonat – Nunkurus Kabupaten Kupang,” Portal J. Tek. Sipil, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 140, 2024, doi: 10.30811/portal.v16i1.4880.

D. A. Putri, Muhtar, and A. Gunasti, “Penerapan Metode CPM dan Crashing pada Proyek Gedung Training Center Universitas Jember Application of the CPM and Crashing Method in the Jember University Training Center Building Project Delvania,” J. Smart Teknol., vol. Vol. 2, No, pp. 151–158, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.unmuhjember.ac.id/index.php/JST

Y. A. Messah, L. H. P. Lona, and D. A. T. Sina, “Pengendalian waktu dan biaya pekerjaan konstruksi sebagai dampak dari perubahan desain (Studi Kasus Embung Irigasi Oenaem, Kecamatan Biboki Selatan, Kabupaten),” J. Tek. Sipil, Univ. Nusa Cendana Kupang, vol. II, no. 2, pp. 121–132, 2013, [Online]. Available: http://jurnalmanajemen.petra.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-teknik-sipil/article/view/18950

Y. A. Wibowo, “Analisis Perbandingan Biaya Dan Waktu Antara Kondisi Normal Dengan Kondisi Percepatan Dengan Penambahan Jumlah Tenaga Kerja,” Univ. Islam Indones., 2019.